What Triggered DraftKings' Post-Earnings Plunge

Key Takeaways

• DraftKings' stock plunged 13.51% after Q4 2025 earnings, primarily due to a significant miss on FY2026 revenue guidance and flat Monthly Unique Payers (MUPs).
• Despite strong Q4 revenue growth of 42.8% and positive net income, the market reacted harshly to the decelerating growth outlook and Cathie Wood's pre-earnings share unload.
• The current valuation presents a complex picture, with a discounted cash flow analysis suggesting undervaluation, but competitive pressures and regulatory risks remain significant headwinds.

What Triggered DraftKings' Post-Earnings Plunge?

DraftKings (NASDAQ: DKNG) shares experienced a brutal sell-off, plummeting 13.51% to $21.76 on February 13, 2026, following its fourth-quarter 2025 earnings report. The immediate catalyst for this sharp decline was a dual disappointment: a miss on adjusted earnings per share (EPS) and, more critically, a significantly softer-than-expected revenue outlook for fiscal year 2026. This repricing event underscores the market's sensitivity to growth expectations in a sector that has historically commanded premium valuations.

The company reported adjusted EPS of $0.36, falling short of the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.50 by a notable 28%. While Q4 revenue of $1.99 billion technically met the consensus mark, it was the forward guidance that truly spooked investors. Management projected FY2026 revenue to be between $6.5 billion and $6.9 billion, a substantial shortfall compared to the Street's consensus of approximately $7.3 billion. This guidance implies a year-over-year growth rate of around 15% at the midpoint, a stark deceleration from the 42.8% revenue growth achieved in Q4 2025.

Beneath the headline numbers, other operational metrics painted a mixed picture. Monthly Unique Payers (MUPs), a key indicator of user base expansion, remained flat year-over-year at 4.8 million, missing FactSet expectations of 5.26 million. This suggests potential market saturation in certain jurisdictions or rising customer acquisition costs. However, Average Revenue per MUP (ARPMUP) surged 43% to $139, driven by higher net revenue margins across both Sportsbook and iGaming, indicating improved monetization of existing users. The company also reported positive net income and record adjusted EBITDA of $343.2 million for the quarter, showcasing improved profitability and efficiency.

Is DraftKings' Growth Story Faltering, or Just Resetting?

The market's visceral reaction to DraftKings' Q4 report raises a fundamental question: is this a sign of a faltering growth story, or merely a reset of overly optimistic expectations? While the projected 15% revenue growth for FY2026 is a significant step down from previous rates, it's important to contextualize this within the maturing U.S. online betting market and the company's strategic shifts. The initial post-PASPA years saw explosive state-by-state expansion, but the pace of new legalizations has naturally slowed.

Management's guidance incorporates substantial investment in its nascent "Predictions" business, a federally regulated event-contract trading platform. This initiative, which DraftKings views as a potential multi-billion-dollar category, represents a long-term growth driver beyond traditional sports betting. However, these investments will naturally weigh on near-term profitability and growth rates, as the company allocates capital to build out this new vertical. The market appears to be struggling to reconcile this long-term vision with the immediate deceleration in core sports betting and iGaming revenue growth.

Furthermore, the online gambling landscape is intensely competitive. DraftKings faces formidable rivals like FanDuel (Flutter), BetMGM, Caesars, and newer entrants like ESPN Bet and Fanatics. While DraftKings maintains a strong market presence, holding approximately 34–38% of U.S. online sports betting (OSB) Gross Gaming Revenue (GGR) share, trailing FanDuel, this environment necessitates aggressive promotional spending and continuous product innovation. These competitive dynamics can pressure margins and customer acquisition costs, making sustained high-velocity growth more challenging. The company's ability to leverage its proprietary technology and expand its iGaming footprint, which offers structurally higher margins, will be crucial for future profitability.

What Does Cathie Wood's Exit Signal for Investors?

Adding another layer of intrigue to DraftKings' post-earnings woes was the revelation that Cathie Wood's ARK Invest funds had offloaded a substantial 785,490 shares of DKNG stock on February 3, 2026, just days before the disappointing earnings release. This pre-emptive move by a high-profile thematic investor, known for her conviction bets, sent ripples through the market and amplified negative sentiment. The proceeds from these sales were reportedly redeployed into crypto-related equities, signaling a potential shift in ARK's conviction regarding the relative near-term prospects of sports betting versus digital asset exposure.

Wood's decision to reduce DraftKings exposure, even before the official earnings and guidance, suggests either a tactical de-risking ahead of a known catalyst or a more fundamental reassessment of the sports betting investment thesis. Given ARK's long-standing advocacy for digital assets, the rotation into crypto names may reflect a view that the risk-reward profile of blockchain technology has become more attractive than sports betting at current valuations. It could also imply that the "Predictions" markets opportunity, while strategically sound, might take longer to materialize than previously anticipated, offering a less immediate return on investment.

For existing DraftKings shareholders, ARK's exit is not necessarily a definitive directional signal. Wood's funds represent a single investor with a specific mandate and time horizon. However, ARK's influence, particularly among retail and thematic investors, means these sales can exert psychological pressure on sentiment. The market will be watching to see if new institutional buyers emerge to absorb the supply and if other prominent investors follow suit. This move highlights the increasing scrutiny on growth stocks and the willingness of large funds to reallocate capital in response to evolving market narratives and perceived opportunities.

Is DKNG Stock Undervalued After the Sell-Off?

Following the significant drop, DraftKings' valuation has become a key point of contention for investors. The stock is currently trading near its 52-week low of $21.01, a steep decline from its 52-week high of $53.50. This dramatic repricing has led some analysts to suggest the stock may now be undervalued, presenting a potential long-term opportunity for patient investors. A Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis, for instance, suggests an intrinsic value of approximately $78.98 per share, implying the stock trades at a substantial 66.3% discount to this estimate. Similarly, comparing the current Price-to-Sales (P/S) ratio of 1.79 to a proprietary "Fair Ratio" of 2.88x also points to potential undervaluation on this metric.

Despite the TTM P/E ratio of 2857.75 and TTM EPS of $0.01 indicating minimal trailing profitability, the company's forward growth prospects and improving operational efficiency are central to the bull case. DraftKings reported positive net income and record adjusted EBITDA in Q4 2025, with full-year 2025 adjusted EBITDA tripling to over $600 million. This demonstrates a clear path towards sustainable profitability as the business scales and promotional spending moderates. The company's strong cash position, with $1.13 billion in cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2025, also provides flexibility for strategic investments and navigating competitive pressures.

However, the "undervalued" narrative hinges on several critical assumptions. The DCF model, for example, relies on aggressive earnings compounding and a richer future earnings multiple, which in turn depends on continued regulatory permissiveness and the successful scaling of new ventures like prediction markets. The market's current skepticism, reflected in the lower FY2026 guidance, suggests that these assumptions are not fully embraced by all investors. The challenge for DraftKings will be to demonstrate consistent execution and deliver on its long-term growth initiatives to bridge the gap between its current market valuation and these more optimistic intrinsic value estimates.

What Are the Key Risks and Opportunities for DraftKings Moving Forward?

DraftKings' future trajectory is a balancing act between significant opportunities and persistent risks. On the opportunity side, the multi-year upside from iGaming legalization remains a powerful catalyst. iGaming offers structurally higher margins than sports betting, and its continued expansion into new states could materially boost DraftKings' profitability. The company's aggressive push into prediction markets, a potential multi-billion-dollar category, also represents a significant long-term growth engine, diversifying its revenue streams beyond traditional sports betting.

Moreover, DraftKings' proprietary technology and focus on product innovation, such as live in-play betting and same-game parlays, continue to drive engagement and cross-sell across its platform. Efficiency initiatives, including improved promotional spend, cost discipline, and leveraging AI for operational optimization, are expanding gross and EBITDA margins, supporting higher net margins and profitability. The company's ability to maintain its strong market presence, particularly in key states like Massachusetts and New York, and to convert its Daily Fantasy Sports (DFS) user base into higher-value sportsbook and iGaming customers, will be crucial.

However, the risks are equally substantial. High effective gaming taxes in important states can compress gross margins and return on invested capital, varying widely and materially affecting unit economics. The concentrated rivalry with well-capitalized peers like FanDuel and BetMGM sustains aggressive customer acquisition cost (CAC) and promotional dynamics, making it challenging to acquire new users profitably. Regulatory scrutiny on advertising, affordability checks, and data privacy is likely to increase compliance spend and restrict certain acquisition levers. Furthermore, the threat of prediction markets eroding DraftKings' user wallet share, or forcing heavier promotional and tax-related pressure, remains a concern. The company's ability to navigate these regulatory and competitive headwinds while executing its long-term growth strategy will determine its success.

The Road Ahead for DKNG Investors

DraftKings finds itself at a critical juncture, navigating the transition from hyper-growth to sustainable profitability in a maturing yet still expanding market. The recent earnings miss and cautious guidance have undoubtedly shaken investor confidence, leading to a significant repricing of the stock. While the immediate reaction was harsh, the underlying business shows signs of improving efficiency and a clear strategic vision for new growth avenues.

For investors, the path forward requires a discerning eye. The current valuation, while seemingly attractive on some metrics, must be weighed against the inherent risks of intense competition, regulatory uncertainty, and the execution challenges of new ventures. Patient investors who believe in the long-term potential of the online gambling and prediction markets, and who are comfortable with near-term volatility, might find the current levels an interesting entry point. However, those seeking immediate, explosive growth may need to temper their expectations as DraftKings focuses on building out its multi-vertical ecosystem for the long haul.

---

Want deeper research on any stock? Try Kavout Pro for AI-powered analysis, smart signals, and more. Already a member? Add credits to run more research.