Investors have been seeking out high-quality companies for decades. The high-quality companies provide persistent profitability, low leverage and high return. Empirical evidences laud the merits of a Quality investment approach. What is agreed: higher profitability, more stable income and cash flows, and a lack of excessive leverage are the marks of quality companies.
Quality has demonstrated the ability to reward long-term investors. Similarly Quality tends to lag during low-quality rallies - or when the lowest-quality stocks lead the market in a rebound.
The demonstration of quality performance shows the comparison of different quality portfolios. Portfolios were rebalanced monthly using a market-cap weighted method, with 20 bps deducted as costs per transaction.
| Annual Return |
| Cumulative Return |
| Volatility |
| Sharpe ratio |
| Calmar ratio |
| Max Drawdown |
| Omega ratio |
| Sortino ratio |
| Skew |
| Kurtosis |
| Tail ratio |
| Monthly value at risk |
| Alpha |
| Beta |
| SPY |
| 9.40% |
| 677.45 |
| 14.50% |
| 0.69 |
| 0.18 |
| -52.56% |
| 1.68 |
| 1.04 |
| -0.61 |
| 1.39 |
| 0.99 |
| -0.06 |
| 0.00% |
| 1.00 |
| Quality Score | Quality Profitability | Quality Growth | Quality Safety |
| 9.28% | 9.59% | 8.13% | 8.27% |
| 658.99 | 709.41 | 495.43 | 513.77 |
| 23.27% | 22.88% | 21.87% | 20.89% |
| 0.50 | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.49 |
| 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.12 |
| -66.51% | -60.27% | -58.53% | -67.33% |
| 1.53 | 1.56 | 1.49 | 1.50 |
| 0.79 | 0.84 | 0.72 | 0.74 |
| 0.01 | 0.33 | -0.14 | -0.09 |
| 5.89 | 5.98 | 4.83 | 5.09 |
| 1.33 | 1.25 | 1.12 | 1.10 |
| -0.10 | -0.10 | -0.10 | -0.09 |
| 0.33% | 0.88% | -0.39% | 0.01% |
| 1.36 | 1.32 | 1.28 | 1.23 |