Compare
Sign Up

Compare/Updated Oct 26, 2026, refreshed every trading day

CQQQ vs KWEB

Invesco China Technology ETF against KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF: 4 years of returns, risk and today’s technical read, from Kavout’s own data.

CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF
$1,298
+29.8% since Oct 28, 2022
$40.26 today+0.8%
KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
$1,310
+31.0% since Oct 28, 2022
$23.14 today-0.3%
Growth of $1,000adjusted closes, dividends included
$853$1,230$1,606$1,983$2,3592023202420252026CQQQ $1,298KWEB $1,310
CQQQKWEB1000 trading days, Kavout market data
The short answer

CQQQ did slightly better over the comparison period: $1,000 invested on October 28, 2022 grew to $1,298, versus $1,310 for KWEB, a difference of $12, while the reported total returns were +29.8% and +31.0%, respectively. However, CQQQ’s recent performance was materially stronger, with 1-year and 3-year returns of -24.7% and +18.5%, compared with KWEB’s -37.8% and -5.9%. CQQQ also had lower expenses at 0.65% versus 0.70%, but higher 12-month volatility at 30.3% versus 28.1%. Its worst drawdown was -45.0%, compared with -42.8% for KWEB. The funds were highly correlated, with daily-move correlation of 0.877, so their diversification benefit was limited. Overall, CQQQ offered better recent and three-year results, while KWEB had lower measured volatility and drawdown.

CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF
$40.26+0.8% today
  • Price is below its 200-day average ($51); 50-day at $46.
  • RSI 27, oversold. Supertrend says sell. ADX 40, so the trend is strong.
CMF Negative CrossADX BearishSupertrend BearishDowntrendA/D Line in a Downtrend
KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
$23.14-0.3% today
  • Price is below its 200-day average ($28); 50-day at $25.
  • RSI 32, neutral. Supertrend says sell. ADX 17, so the trend is weak.
Supertrend BearishDowntrendA/D Line in a DowntrendOBV FallingPrice Below VWAP

Head to head

Which has returned more, CQQQ or KWEB?

CQQQ beat KWEB in 25 of the last 48 months; KWEB won the other 23. The typical monthly gap was 3.28 points.

Total return by period

CQQQKWEB
1 month
-13.6%
-6.3%
3 months
-21.2%
-14.3%
6 months
-19.6%
-19.7%
YTD
-22.6%
-32.0%
1 year
-24.7%
-37.8%
3 years
+18.5%
-5.9%
Since 2022-10
+29.8%
+31.0%

Which is riskier?

Volatility, last 12 months
30.3%
28.1%
Worst drawdown since 2022
-45.0%
-42.8%

CQQQ: Jan 26, 2023 to Feb 2, 2024; KWEB: Oct 2, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026

0.877
correlation of daily moves, 4 years
0.82
CQQQ move per 1% in KWEB
0.701
correlation, last 12 months

Month by month

CQQQ led 25
KWEB led 23

Of the last 48 months. The typical gap was 3.28 points.

When did they diverge?

MonthCQQQKWEBGap
July 2026-11.8%+16.4%-28.23 pts
November 2022+28.6%+48.0%-19.32 pts
June 2026+8.0%-8.4%+16.47 pts
May 2026+3.5%-7.1%+10.60 pts

Where the numbers come from. 1000 daily adjusted closes per fund from the Kavout market-data API, dividends included. Signals and indicators are Kavout’s own, refreshed nightly. Every figure is calculated from those adjusted closes.

Holdings and fees

What do you actually own with CQQQ and KWEB?

CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
Expense ratio
0.65%
Fund assets
$2B
Price
$40.26
0.877
correlation
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Expense ratio
0.7%
Fund assets
$4B
Price
$23.14

Go deeper

Ask InvestGPT which one fits your portfolio.

Eight research agents read your holdings, the overlap and the tax side, then answer in plain words. Free accounts get one report a month.

More comparisons

Find another comparison.

Track both, get told when something changes.

Add CQQQ and KWEB to a watchlist and Kavout emails you when a signal flips or a price target is hit.

Free account, no card