Compare
Sign Up

Compare/Updated Oct 26, 2026, refreshed every trading day

QQQM vs SCHG

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF against Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF: 4 years of returns, risk and today’s technical read, from Kavout’s own data.

QQQMInvesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
$2,572
+157.2% since Oct 28, 2022
$290.06 today+0.0%
SCHGSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
$2,406
+140.6% since Oct 28, 2022
$34.82 today-0.3%
Growth of $1,000adjusted closes, dividends included
$894$1,385$1,875$2,366$2,8562023202420252026QQQM $2,572SCHG $2,406
QQQMSCHG1000 trading days, Kavout market data
The short answer

QQM outperformed SCHG over the period: $1,000 invested on October 28, 2022 grew to $2,572 versus $2,406, a difference of $166. QQQM also led over three years (+97.5% versus +90.4%), the past year (+16.9% versus +9.1%), and year to date (+15.1% versus +7.1%). The trade-off was higher risk: QQQM’s 12-month volatility was 19.9% versus 16.8% for SCHG, while its worst drawdown was slightly smaller at -22.7% versus -23.4%. Their daily moves were highly correlated at 0.967, so the funds behaved similarly, but QQQM’s stronger results came with a higher 0.15% expense ratio versus SCHG’s 0.04%. SCHG delivered lower recent returns and volatility at a substantially lower cost, while QQQM provided the better outcome over this period.

QQQMInvesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
$290.06+0.0% today
  • Price is above its 200-day average ($278); 50-day at $299.
  • RSI 37, neutral. Supertrend says sell. ADX 25, so the trend is developing.
ADX BearishSupertrend BearishDowntrendA/D Line in a DowntrendOBV Falling
SCHGSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
$34.82-0.3% today
  • Price is above its 200-day average ($33); 50-day at $36.
  • RSI 38, neutral. Supertrend says sell. ADX 23, so the trend is developing.
CMF Negative CrossADX BearishSupertrend BearishDowntrendA/D Line in a Downtrend

Head to head

Which has returned more, QQQM or SCHG?

QQQM beat SCHG in 25 of the last 48 months; SCHG won the other 23. The typical monthly gap was 0.70 points.

Total return by period

QQQMSCHG
1 month
-4.9%
-3.4%
3 months
+3.4%
+3.8%
6 months
+6.3%
+6.0%
YTD
+15.1%
+7.1%
1 year
+16.9%
+9.1%
3 years
+97.5%
+90.4%
Since 2022-10
+157.2%
+140.6%

Which is riskier?

Volatility, last 12 months
19.9%
16.8%
Worst drawdown since 2022
-22.7%
-23.4%

QQQM: Feb 19, 2025 to Apr 8, 2025; SCHG: Dec 16, 2024 to Apr 8, 2025

0.967
correlation of daily moves, 4 years
1.01
QQQM move per 1% in SCHG
0.893
correlation, last 12 months

Month by month

QQQM led 25
SCHG led 23

Of the last 48 months. The typical gap was 0.70 points.

When did they diverge?

MonthQQQMSCHGGap
July 2026-6.5%+1.0%-7.47 pts
May 2026+10.6%+6.7%+3.84 pts
June 2026-0.2%-3.6%+3.36 pts
January 2026+1.2%-1.9%+3.15 pts

Where the numbers come from. 1000 daily adjusted closes per fund from the Kavout market-data API, dividends included. Signals and indicators are Kavout’s own, refreshed nightly. Every figure is calculated from those adjusted closes.

Holdings and fees

What do you actually own with QQQM and SCHG?

QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Expense ratio
0.15%
Fund assets
$78B
Price
$290.06
0.967
correlation
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Expense ratio
0.04%
Fund assets
$62B
Price
$34.82

Go deeper

Ask InvestGPT which one fits your portfolio.

Eight research agents read your holdings, the overlap and the tax side, then answer in plain words. Free accounts get one report a month.

More comparisons

Find another comparison.

Track both, get told when something changes.

Add QQQM and SCHG to a watchlist and Kavout emails you when a signal flips or a price target is hit.

Free account, no card