MarketLens

Log in

Is the EV Market Still Revving, or Running on Fumes

1 hour ago
SHARE THIS ON:

Is the EV Market Still Revving, or Running on Fumes

Key Takeaways

  • Rivian (RIVN) is making a critical pivot to the mass market with its R2 SUV, aiming for positive gross profit and significant delivery growth in 2026.
  • Lucid (LCID) continues to struggle with high production costs and limited market appeal for its luxury vehicles, necessitating workforce cuts and a delayed push for affordability.
  • Despite both facing substantial losses, Rivian's improving gross margins and clearer path to scale make it a more compelling, albeit still speculative, investment compared to Lucid's ongoing execution risks.

Is the EV Market Still Revving, or Running on Fumes?

The electric vehicle (EV) sector has seen its share of euphoria and reality checks over the past few years. Once the darlings of Wall Street, many EV startups now navigate a landscape marked by moderating demand, intense competition, and the relentless pressure to achieve profitability. This shifting dynamic has put companies like Rivian Automotive (NASDAQ: RIVN) and Lucid Group (NASDAQ: LCID) under the microscope, as investors scrutinize their strategies to transition from ambitious startups to sustainable automakers.

Both Rivian and Lucid, despite their distinct market approaches, share a common challenge: scaling production while burning through significant capital. The broader EV market itself is undergoing a transformation, with the phaseout of certain federal incentives and a general slowdown in adoption compared to earlier, more optimistic projections. This environment demands not just innovative products, but also impeccable execution and a clear path to financial health.

Against this backdrop, the recent performance of these stocks reflects investor apprehension. Rivian, trading at $15.27 as of February 20, 2026, has seen its shares fall 84% since its 2021 IPO. Lucid, currently at $9.55, has also faced a steep decline, trading near its 52-week low of $9.50. The question for active traders isn't just about survival, but which of these challengers is better positioned to capture market share and eventually deliver shareholder value in a maturing industry.

Can Rivian's R2 SUV Deliver on Its Mass-Market Promise?

Rivian's future hinges significantly on the successful launch and ramp-up of its R2 mid-size SUV, scheduled to begin production in the second quarter of 2026. This vehicle, with a projected starting price of $45,000, represents a strategic pivot from its premium R1T pickup and R1S SUV, aiming to tap into a much larger, more accessible consumer segment. Management anticipates total deliveries across all models to reach between 62,000 and 67,000 vehicles in 2026, a substantial jump from the 42,247 units delivered in 2025.

The R2 is expected to account for approximately 20,000 to 25,000 deliveries in its inaugural year, with production initially on a single shift at the Normal, Illinois plant before adding a second shift later in 2026. This phased approach reflects lessons learned from earlier launches, where supply chain constraints and slower-than-expected ramp-ups were common. By the end of 2027, CEO RJ Scaringe envisions the R2 becoming the majority of Rivian's total production, with the Normal plant eventually supporting up to 155,000 R2 units annually.

Financially, Rivian has shown encouraging signs, reporting a $120 million gross profit in Q4 and achieving its first full year of positive gross profit in 2025. This improvement in production efficiency is critical, even as the company projects a net loss of between $1.8 billion and $2.1 billion in 2026. Wall Street analysts largely acknowledge the R2's importance, with many raising price targets after Rivian's Q4 beat and R2 update. Stifel, for instance, maintained a "Buy" rating on February 17, 2026, raising its price target to $20 from $17, citing better-than-expected sales guidance.

Is Lucid's Luxury Niche Sustainable Amidst Cost Pressures?

Lucid Group, in stark contrast to Rivian's mass-market pivot, has historically focused on the ultra-luxury segment with its high-performance Air sedan. While the Air has garnered critical acclaim for its range and technology, its price point of $100,000 or more severely limits its addressable market. This strategy has led to persistent struggles with production scale and profitability, culminating in a recent decision to cut 12% of its global workforce in a bid to streamline operations and push closer to profitability.

The company's financial performance underscores these challenges. Lucid reported an EPS miss of 3.31initslastearningsreport(November5,2025),withrevenueofjust-3.31** in its last earnings report (**November 5, 2025**), with revenue of just **0.3 billion. Its gross margins remain deeply negative at -97.9% on a TTM basis, reflecting the high cost of producing its bespoke vehicles at low volumes. While Lucid has teased plans for a more affordable mid-size EV priced near $50,000 and the Gravity SUV, updates have been scarce, and production timelines are often subject to delays. The mid-size SUV production is expected to begin in late 2026 at its Saudi Arabia factory, but past missed milestones suggest this could extend into 2027.

Despite these hurdles, Lucid does have some potential long-term catalysts. The company has partnered with Uber Technologies for a premium global robotaxi program, which could offer new avenues for expansion and boost sales beyond direct consumers. Furthermore, Lucid benefits from strong backing by Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund (PIF), which owns nearly two-thirds of its shares and provides a crucial liquidity cushion. Lucid ended its latest quarter with approximately $5.7 billion in liquidity, which it claims can carry it through the Gravity SUV launch. However, the market remains skeptical, with Morgan Stanley downgrading LCID to "Underweight" on December 8, 2025, highlighting ongoing concerns about its path to profitability.

How Do the Financials Stack Up: Rivian vs. Lucid?

A direct comparison of their TTM financial fundamentals reveals the stark differences in their operational efficiency and financial health. Rivian, with a market cap of $18.89 billion, dwarfs Lucid's $3.10 billion. This valuation gap reflects, in part, Rivian's higher production volumes and a clearer, albeit still challenging, path to scaling. Rivian’s TTM revenue stands at $4.37 billion, significantly higher than Lucid’s $3.41 billion, indicating a more robust sales base.

Crucially, Rivian has made strides in improving its margins. Its TTM gross margin is 2.7%, a notable achievement for an EV startup, especially when compared to Lucid's deeply negative -97.9%. While both companies are still operating at a net loss (Rivian's TTM net margin is -67.7% vs. Lucid's -214.1%), Rivian's positive gross margin signals that its unit economics are improving, a critical step towards eventual profitability. Lucid's negative gross margin, on the other hand, indicates that it's still losing money on every vehicle sold before even considering operating expenses.

In terms of liquidity, Rivian holds a strong cash position of approximately $7 billion as of Q3 2025, providing roughly three years of operational funding through its R2 ramp-up period. Lucid also maintains a substantial $5.7 billion in liquidity, largely thanks to its Saudi Arabian backing. However, Lucid's higher cash burn rate, reflected in its TTM FCF of 10.89persharecomparedtoRivians-10.89** per share compared to Rivian's **-2.02 per share, means that this capital could deplete faster if production and profitability don't improve significantly. Both companies carry considerable debt, with D/E ratios of 1.46 for Rivian and 1.56 for Lucid, highlighting the capital-intensive nature of their businesses.

What Does Wall Street Say, and What Are the Key Risks?

Wall Street analysts are clearly more optimistic about Rivian's prospects than Lucid's, though both remain speculative plays. Rivian holds a consensus "Buy" rating from 28 analysts, with a median price target of $18.00, implying an upside of over 17% from its current price of $15.27. Recent analyst activity for Rivian includes Stifel maintaining a "Buy" rating on February 17, 2026, while DA Davidson downgraded it to "Underperform" on the same day, citing execution risks with the R2. This split view highlights the high-stakes nature of the R2 launch.

Lucid, by contrast, carries a consensus "Hold" rating from 14 analysts, with a median price target of $15.50. While this target suggests a significant upside from its current $9.55, the "Hold" rating reflects a more cautious stance. Morgan Stanley's downgrade to "Underweight" in December 2025 underscores concerns about Lucid's ability to scale and achieve profitability. The market is clearly waiting for concrete evidence of improved production and a viable path to broader market appeal before committing further.

The primary risk for both companies remains execution. For Rivian, the R2 launch is paramount; any delays, quality issues, or slower-than-expected demand could severely impact its financial trajectory. The broader EV market slowdown and intense competition from established automakers like Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) also pose significant headwinds. For Lucid, the challenge is even greater: proving it can transition from a niche luxury player to a higher-volume manufacturer, while simultaneously addressing its deeply negative margins and high cash burn. The success of its mid-size EV and robotaxi ventures is crucial, but these are still years away from materializing into substantial revenue or profit.

Which EV Challenger Is the More Compelling Investment?

When weighing Rivian against Lucid, Rivian emerges as the more compelling, albeit still high-risk, investment for active traders. Its strategic pivot to the mass-market R2 SUV, coupled with demonstrable progress in improving gross margins and a higher production run rate, offers a clearer narrative for future growth. While both companies face substantial hurdles, Rivian's operational efficiency is showing signs of improvement, a critical factor in the capital-intensive EV industry.

Lucid, despite its technological prowess and luxury appeal, continues to grapple with fundamental business challenges, including deeply negative gross margins and a slower path to broader market adoption. Its reliance on the high-end segment, while offering prestige, limits its volume potential and exacerbates the struggle for profitability. The workforce cuts signal a necessary, but painful, acknowledgment of these realities.

Investors looking for exposure to the next generation of EV manufacturers should consider Rivian's aggressive strategy and improving financials, but remain vigilant regarding the R2's execution. Lucid, while possessing long-term potential in autonomous driving and more affordable models, presents a higher degree of uncertainty and a longer runway to profitability. For now, Rivian appears to be navigating the challenging EV landscape with a more defined and potentially more successful roadmap.


Want deeper research on any stock? Try Kavout Pro for AI-powered analysis, smart signals, and more. Already a member? Add credits to run more research.

SHARE THIS ON:

Related Articles

Category

You may also like

No related articles available

Breaking News

View All →

No topics available at the moment